noloadfundinvestor.com

Welcome

Subscriber
Log-In


Who is Mark Salzinger?

Newsletter
Highlights


Education

How to Order
The No-Load
Fund Investor





The No-Load Fund Investor The No-Load Fund Investor

Highlights of the Current Issue
of The No-Load Fund Investor

From The No-Load Fund Investor, 1/17...

New Year’s Tweaks

The market ended 2016 in a festive mood. While the S&P 500 gained 1.8% in December, even the much maligned MSCI EAFE Index of foreign developed-country stocks thrived, with a gain of 3.3%. For the year, the S&P 500 was up 9.5% pre-dividends and almost 12.0% with dividends, while the small-cap Russell 2000 Index performed especially strongly, with a gain of about 20.0%.

The year’s losers resided mainly overseas, as the MSCI EAFE lost 1.9% pre-dividends. However, even in the U.S., the healthcare sector lost money, pulled down by the biotechnology industry. Among funds, the best diversified performers tended toward those of the small- and mid-cap value style, while the worst were the so-called blue-chip growth funds.

Though indexes of higher-quality bonds were up for the entire year, they struggled in the last half. Case in point: the Barclays Treasury Bond Index plummeted 12.0% from July through December. Lower-quality bonds performed better, however, as several high-yield corporate bond funds in our database notched total returns in 2016 of more than 10%.

Best Buys Commentary. Our Best Buys models had a decent year, with gains in the mid-4% range for our most conservative models up to 10.8% for ETF Pre-Retirement. Our best performers invest mainly in small-cap and mid-cap value stocks. On the other hand, our weakest diversified equity performers included funds that invest almost exclusively in large-cap growth stocks.

For details on year-end performance and fund winners and losers, see our January issue.

Forecast for 2017

In our stock market forecast for 2016, we were wrong on a few things but right on the big picture. This likely resulted in a pretty good year for most of the subscribers who followed our advice.

We were wrong to rely to some extent on so-called PEG ratios (price/earnings ratio [P/E] compared with earnings growth), which led us to incorrect calls on size/style combinations in the marketplace. For example, our then-favorite sector, large-cap growth, ended up the laggard for the year, despite offering above-average earnings growth compared to its P/E, while mid-cap value was among the best, despite scoring poorly by this measure.

However, we correctly forecast an advantage for U.S. equities in 2016 compared with foreign equities, especially developed markets, and a decent return for equities overall. We predicted correctly that the Federal Reserve Board would remain friendly to the markets while corporate earnings eventually improved. And, most important, we were right to reconfirm our basic belief in diversification across equity styles, sizes and regions, regardless of our particular forecasts for each.

Looking Forward. Before stating our expectations for the 2017 equity markets, let’s first go over several factors that tend to influence them, including Federal Reserve policy, valuations, corporate earnings, and market sentiment.

A less-friendly Fed. Generally speaking, a change in the trend of Federal Reserve policy rates from looser to tighter is negative for equity markets. However, in the early stages of a tightening cycle, especially if the starting point is low, stocks can still do well. In fact, it can take years for the equity market to break down during a tightening cycle beginning from very low rates.

Case in point: in June 2004, the Federal funds rate was at a very low level of 1%, about where it had been for a year. This represented the lowest point of a multiyear trend of lower rates that followed the burst of the Internet bubble. After two-plus years of tightening by the end of 2006, the rate stood at 5.25%, yet the equity market performed fairly well during this period, with an annualized gain a little higher than the long-term average. In fact, in 2005, the first full year of the tightening cycle—and thus equivalent to current expectations for 2017—the S&P 500 produced a total return of 15.6%.

You can read our full 2017 forecast for investment markets and asset classes, including likely catalysts, in the January issue of The No-Load Fund Investor


Model Portfolios

Sample Model Portfolio from the Current Issue
of The No-Load Fund Investor

Wealth Builder Portfolio

Fund

Obj.

Beta

% Weighting

Price QM Small Cap Gr Eq agg gr 1.01 10%
RiverPark Large Growth growth 1.10 5%
Price Blue Chip Growth growth 1.07 5%
Vangd Total Stock Market Idx growth 0.98 15%
Amer Century MidCap Val growth 0.83 10%
Artisan Global Opps global 0.97 10%
Causeway Int'l Value int'l 0.89 5%
Grandeur Peak Glbl Stalwarts global 0.87* 5%
Vangd U.S. Value gr-inc 0.92 10%
Vangd Equity Income gr-inc 0.88 10%
Fidelity New Markets Inc. bond 0.37 5%
Vanguard Prime Money Market money mkt 0.00 10%
* = Estimated
N = New this month
H = Hold
W = increased portfolio weighting
D = Deletion this month
Average portfolio beta: 0.82
Average expense ratio: 0.74%
Since January 1, 1988, $10,000 has grown to $167,564


Best Buy Portfolios

 

Wealth Builder

Pre-Retirement

Retirement

Income & Preservation

Cash 10% 15% 20% 20%
Bonds 5% 15% 30% 60%
U.S. Equities 70% 60% 45% 15%
Int'l Equities 15% 10% 5% 5%
Portfolio returns since 1/1/88 through most recent month ($10,000 original investment) $167,564 $150,638 $110,533 $15,779
since 2/1/09
Average portfolio Beta 0.82 0.68 0.47 0.23
Average expense ratio 0.74 0.70 0.53 0.61

Back to top.


For questions regarding our services or a subscription,
call (800) 706-6364.
Ask for our World Wide Web Special Offer.
You also can  e-mail us at:

NoLoad@mleesmith.com

Copyright 2006 The No-Load Fund Investor. All rights reserved.

The No-Load Fund Investor
P.O. Box 3029, Brentwood, TN 37024